Computer Science Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for students, researchers and practitioners of computer science. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In Sipser's book of Theory of Computation, related to Reducibility, it's written

if A is undecidable and reducible to B, B is undecidable.

The confusion is, only a solution to B determines a solution to A, if i'm not wrong. So, for instance if B is decidable and A is undecidable, what does it mean? Here B isn't undecidable.

Hope you got it.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Suppose $A$ is undecidable and reducible to $B$. Given an algorithm for $B$, you can use the reduction from $A$ to $B$ to get an algorithm for $A$, which we assumed is impossible. Therefore $B$ must be undecidable.

If $A$ is undecidable and reducible to $B$ and $B$ is decidable then we obtain a contradiction and everything goes. Pigs can fly.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.