Take the 2-minute tour ×
Computer Science Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for students, researchers and practitioners of computer science. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm trying to solve a graph problem ( it's not for homework, just to practise my skills ).

A dag $G(V,E)$ is given, where $V$ is the set of vertices and $E$ the edges. The graph is represented as an adjacency list, so $A_i$ is a set containing all the connections of $i$.

My task is to find which vertices are reachable from each vertex $v\in V$.

The solution I use has a complexity of $O(V^3)$, with transitive closure, but i read that in a blog it can be faster, although it didn't reveal how. Could anyone tell me an other way ( with better complexity ) to solve the transitive closure problem in a dag? Thanks in advance.

share|improve this question

migrated from cstheory.stackexchange.com Dec 13 '12 at 8:03

This question came from our site for theoretical computer scientists and researchers in related fields.

    
What is $f(\cdot)$? –  Dimitris Dec 6 '12 at 18:18
    
@JɛffE Sorry I edited it. I misunderstood what the blog said. –  Rondogiannis Aristophanes Dec 6 '12 at 18:45
5  
i think this is for cs@stackexchange –  Sasho Nikolov Dec 6 '12 at 19:28
1  
Check this out: sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304397588900321 –  George Dec 6 '12 at 20:57
    
@Kaveh isn't the problem exactly transitive closure here? –  Sasho Nikolov Dec 13 '12 at 8:26

1 Answer 1

Here is an $O(VE)$ algorithm, which is substantially better than $O(V^3)$ if the graph is sparse. First do a topological sort, in time $O(V+E)$. Now work your way backwards, storing which vertices are reachable. At a vertex of outdegree $d$, this requires $O(dV)$ work, so in total you get $O(VE)$.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.