First of all sorry, if this question already exists, in that case, pointing to the right direction will be appreciated.
Secondly, sorry, if the question is below the expected level of Niveau, but all help appreciated.
In the textbook by J. Hromkovic, named "Theoretical Computer Science, Introduction to Automata, Computability, Complexity, Algorithmics", in Page 110, in the 2003 edition, i note that the alphabet of a single tape TM which simulates a multitape TM is given by
$$ \Gamma_{single\ tape} = (\Sigma_{multi\ tape} \cup \{¢,␣ , $ \})\times \{\uparrow , ␣ \} \times (\Gamma_{multi\ tape}\cup\{ ␣,\uparrow\})^{k} \cup \Sigma_{multi\ tape} \cup \{¢\} $$
should that not be, instead:
$$ (\Gamma_{multi\ tape} \cup \{¢,␣ , $ \})\times \{\uparrow , ␣ \} \times (\Gamma_{multi\ tape}\cup\{ ␣,\uparrow\})^{k} \cup \{¢\} ? $$
according to the book, the single tape TM splits its tape in "tracks" , see image i scanned from the book: http://imgur.com/CwnyS
because, the last $¢$ is the primary left end marker, the first two terms of the Cartesian product series is responsible for the top two track, the rest $k$ tracks are constructed by the term which has k in exponent.
all help is appreciated. sorry for the dummy question. i am a meteorologist, who takes his past time in computer programming.
ps, i can neither embed (is that the correct term?) the ¢ character by \cent nor the ␣ by \textvisiblespace in a post like this. does stackexchange use a different command for those? thank you