# Finding all cliques of a graph

Given a graph with $n \leq 50$ vertices. Count all $k$-cliques of this graph, where $k = 1, \ldots , n$.

I need the most efficient algorithm.

-
Where have you looked, what have you tried? What is your motivation for asking? – Raphael Feb 2 '13 at 19:27

Your problem (assuming I understand your English correctly) is counting the number of cliques in a graph of size $n = 50$. Counting the number of cliques in a graph is #P-complete (see this paper, which shows that counting the number of independent sets in a graph is #P-complete even for bipartite graphs).

Several efficient exponential time algorithms for the problem (efficient in the sense that their running time is $O(c^n)$ for $c<2$) are described in Jeff Erickson's lecture notes - see section 4.2 on page 4. The simplest algorithm, whose running time is $O(\phi^n)$ (where $\phi$ is the golden ratio), is as follows. For an arbitrary vertex $v \in G$ with neighborhood $N(v)$, we have the following recurrence for the number $I(G)$ of independent sets in $G$ (to get the number of cliques, complement $G$): $$I(G) = \begin{cases} 2I(G-v), & N(v) = \emptyset, \\ I(G-v) + I(G\setminus(N(v)+v)), & \text{otherwise}. \end{cases}$$

This algorithm might be practical for $n=50$. If it isn't, you can try the other algorithms described in the lecture notes. Some of them require some modification for your case, and therefore the running times listed there might not hold in your case.

-
The algorithm I outlined can be adapted to your clarified question. – Yuval Filmus Jan 27 '13 at 19:33
Your first link is broken. Can you please fix it and also include the paper title in the post (so we can google it up next time)? – Szabolcs Oct 23 '15 at 16:54
@Szabolcs Judging from the link it's not a published paper. – Yuval Filmus Oct 23 '15 at 20:07
It seems I can download it with curl, even though my browser wouldn't open the link. It's this paper. Could you please edit that into the question somehow? E.g. add the DOI or some other permanent identifier in case the link goes fully dead? – Szabolcs Oct 23 '15 at 20:10
@Szabolcs You can also edit my answer. Someone will have to approve your edit, that's all. – Yuval Filmus Oct 23 '15 at 20:12

i think you can count the number of 2-children-parties first, store the structure of the party, and use this to search for the 3-children-parties, etc. Cheers !

-
How does this answer the question? It's like saying "In order to drive from A to B, you first find the next intersection to go to, from there the second and so on" -- clearly not an effective method for finding your way. – Raphael Feb 2 '13 at 19:28