Timeline for How to distinguish between the different frequency domains?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2013 at 11:16 | comment | added | Wandering Logic | Mine were (I deleted them). I hope @user1095332 agrees, but I don't know if they've yet had a chance to confirm that my edits answer their question. | |
| Apr 24, 2013 at 6:27 | comment | added | Raphael | Are these comments obsolete now you edited? | |
| Apr 23, 2013 at 22:00 | history | edited | Wandering Logic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
I don't know what I was talking about that \omega is only useful in [0,1]. That's just wrong.
|
| Apr 23, 2013 at 21:53 | history | edited | Wandering Logic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Moved clarification from discussion into the answer.
|
| Apr 23, 2013 at 21:41 | history | edited | Wandering Logic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
be clear about what the domain is in each case, since notation for integer-domain functions is subscripts rather than parens
|
| Apr 23, 2013 at 21:34 | history | edited | Wandering Logic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Changed to using \omega as the frequency variable in the Fourier transform, so 'f' can go back to being the function of time. It was horrible to change 'f' from a function to a frequency in less than a paragraph.
|
| Apr 23, 2013 at 19:49 | comment | added | user1095332 | Thanks. But how would you answer a general public question like: "Are there multiple frequency domains? Why do you need multiple frequency domains in the first place? What makes them different from each other?" How would you answer that? | |
| Apr 22, 2013 at 18:50 | history | edited | Wandering Logic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed the wikipedia link
|
| Apr 21, 2013 at 14:47 | history | edited | Wandering Logic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
context refers to domain not range
|
| Apr 21, 2013 at 14:41 | history | answered | Wandering Logic | CC BY-SA 3.0 |