Timeline for Are these special (one production) Context-Free Grammars always unambiguous?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2019 at 14:05 | comment | added | meci | Thank you so much! | |
| Nov 3, 2019 at 13:45 | comment | added | Vimal Patel | I will surely try to find them. And if I succeed then will post them. | |
| Nov 3, 2019 at 13:20 | comment | added | meci | Ahh! I see what you did here. By "canceling out" $S_1$ and $S_3$ you have effectively violated Rule 3 without explicitly doing so. Very interesting! Are there any counterexamples that don't "pseudo-violate" these rules? | |
| Nov 3, 2019 at 11:21 | history | edited | Vimal Patel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 164 characters in body
|
| Nov 3, 2019 at 11:16 | history | edited | Vimal Patel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 164 characters in body
|
| Nov 3, 2019 at 11:00 | history | answered | Vimal Patel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |