Timeline for Organizing a "speedback"
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2020 at 16:22 | history | became hot network question | |||
| May 22, 2020 at 12:58 | history | edited | Luís Soares | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| May 22, 2020 at 12:48 | comment | added | Luís Soares | initially I wanted to know the functional programming approach but then I realized maybe this is not the place to ask. So I decided to still leave the question to learn more about the theory behind it. | |
| May 22, 2020 at 12:46 | vote | accept | Luís Soares | ||
| May 22, 2020 at 11:56 | answer | added | Yuval Filmus | timeline score: 5 | |
| May 22, 2020 at 11:50 | comment | added | Discrete lizard♦ | The general problem you're describing here seems to be finding a schedule for a round-robin tournament. There are many ways to construct such a schedule, some of them listed here. However, the link you give already describes a way to get a round-robin schedule, known as the "circle method". Do you want to find a different method? Or is there something you want to know about the method given in the link? | |
| May 22, 2020 at 11:43 | history | edited | Luís Soares | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 48 characters in body
|
| May 22, 2020 at 11:39 | comment | added | Luís Soares | better explanation here medium.com/@joshdesign/… you can scroll to the end to the images | |
| May 22, 2020 at 11:36 | comment | added | Luís Soares | you're right. it was ambiguous | |
| May 22, 2020 at 11:35 | comment | added | Yuval Filmus | The term "dating" has very specific connotations in English. | |
| May 22, 2020 at 11:34 | comment | added | Luís Soares | I could have said A, B, C, D and F but I decided to give my real problem. | |
| May 22, 2020 at 11:33 | comment | added | Luís Soares | here the sex is irrelevant. we work in a team and everyone has to give feedback to everyone. I wanted to give a real problem behind to make it more easy to explain maybe I failed. I edited to make it more clear | |
| May 22, 2020 at 11:31 | history | edited | Luís Soares | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 144 characters in body
|
| May 22, 2020 at 11:25 | comment | added | Yuval Filmus | Your current code considers all pairs of people out of both men and women at the same time. This means that you're also considering homosexual pairs. I have absolutely no problem with that, but I suspect that it's not what you intended. | |
| May 22, 2020 at 11:24 | comment | added | Luís Soares | forget Kotlin. you can reply in pseudocode I'll give an input and output in the example in a while :) heterosexual?! I did not get the question. all have to give feedback to all. there's no sex related question | |
| May 22, 2020 at 10:26 | comment | added | Yuval Filmus | Also, note that if you're interested in heterosexual dating, then you probability want to take the Cartesian product of the set of men with the set of women, rather than what you're doing. | |
| May 22, 2020 at 10:25 | comment | added | Yuval Filmus | Moreover, I don't understand what you're looking for. What is the input, and what is the required output? | |
| May 22, 2020 at 10:25 | comment | added | Yuval Filmus | Kotlin-specific questions are off-topic here. | |
| May 22, 2020 at 8:30 | history | edited | Luís Soares | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 52 characters in body
|
| May 22, 2020 at 8:22 | history | edited | Luís Soares | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 52 characters in body
|
| May 22, 2020 at 8:16 | history | asked | Luís Soares | CC BY-SA 4.0 |