Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 19, 2023 at 14:18 comment added m4r35n357 BTW, print(~(a**9)) also works if you can bear the domain restriction a>0.
Sep 19, 2023 at 12:25 comment added m4r35n357 I have reproduced correct results in the Python version of my software. github.com/m4r35n357/ODE-Playground/tree/python. This is from an ipython session (I have used vertical bars in place of carriage returns): Context.places = 6 | a = Series.get(10, 1.0).var | print(~(a * a * a * a * a * a * a * a * a)) | +1.000000e+00 +9.000000e+00 +7.200000e+01 +5.040000e+02 +3.024000e+03 +1.512000e+04 +6.048000e+04 +1.814400e+05 +3.628800e+05 +3.628800e+05
Sep 19, 2023 at 11:11 comment added m4r35n357 Non-direct PDF link aimsciences.org/article/doi/10.3934/proc.2013.2013.587 from author's home page: neidinger.net/publicat.html
Sep 19, 2023 at 10:42 comment added m4r35n357 Are you asking about "numerically defined" functions, or those described by differentiable "component" functions. I ask because if the latter, you can determine higher derivative fairly trivially, without numerical errors caused by small time steps. This technique is inexplicably (to me) relatively unknown in the numerical analysis world. See here for an example: pdfs.semanticscholar.org/fb1d/…
Jul 12, 2021 at 20:22 vote accept Natrium
Jul 12, 2021 at 1:39 answer added Pseudonym timeline score: 3
Jul 9, 2021 at 18:05 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Jun 9, 2021 at 17:51 history edited D.W.
edited tags
Jun 9, 2021 at 17:51 answer added D.W. timeline score: 1
Jun 9, 2021 at 17:21 review First posts
Jun 23, 2021 at 17:20
Jun 9, 2021 at 17:18 history asked Natrium CC BY-SA 4.0