2 English sentences start with uppercase
source | link

thisThis is a very difficult area to ensure program correctness as far as ruling out race conditions, a sort of "achilles heel" of parallel processing. theThe best approach for program correctness is generally to avoid low-level primitives and work with higher-level design patterns (eg from libraries) that ensure thread synchronization. thereThere is one model CSP, communicating sequential processes by Hoare, that has some proofs of correctness given that developers limit themselves to the "framework". itIt has some conceptual similarity & chronological origination/overlap to unix "pipes and filters" although havent (yet?) found a direct link between the two.

twoTwo other frameworks that attempt to improve parallelization correctness through design patterns, and which have most of the standard/known algorithms/design patterns for this purpose:

this is a very difficult area to ensure program correctness as far as ruling out race conditions, a sort of "achilles heel" of parallel processing. the best approach for program correctness is generally to avoid low-level primitives and work with higher-level design patterns (eg from libraries) that ensure thread synchronization. there is one model CSP, communicating sequential processes by Hoare, that has some proofs of correctness given that developers limit themselves to the "framework". it has some conceptual similarity & chronological origination/overlap to unix "pipes and filters" although havent (yet?) found a direct link between the two.

two other frameworks that attempt to improve parallelization correctness through design patterns, and which have most of the standard/known algorithms/design patterns for this purpose:

This is a very difficult area to ensure program correctness as far as ruling out race conditions, a sort of "achilles heel" of parallel processing. The best approach for program correctness is generally to avoid low-level primitives and work with higher-level design patterns (eg from libraries) that ensure thread synchronization. There is one model CSP, communicating sequential processes by Hoare, that has some proofs of correctness given that developers limit themselves to the "framework". It has some conceptual similarity & chronological origination/overlap to unix "pipes and filters" although havent (yet?) found a direct link between the two.

Two other frameworks that attempt to improve parallelization correctness through design patterns, and which have most of the standard/known algorithms/design patterns for this purpose:

1
source | link

this is a very difficult area to ensure program correctness as far as ruling out race conditions, a sort of "achilles heel" of parallel processing. the best approach for program correctness is generally to avoid low-level primitives and work with higher-level design patterns (eg from libraries) that ensure thread synchronization. there is one model CSP, communicating sequential processes by Hoare, that has some proofs of correctness given that developers limit themselves to the "framework". it has some conceptual similarity & chronological origination/overlap to unix "pipes and filters" although havent (yet?) found a direct link between the two.

two other frameworks that attempt to improve parallelization correctness through design patterns, and which have most of the standard/known algorithms/design patterns for this purpose: