Timeline for Does the language of Regular Expressions need a push down automata to parse it?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 21, 2012 at 15:35 | comment | added | Bruce Ediger | For a practical answer, you could look at the Plan 9 Grep source for grep.y. | |
May 20, 2012 at 17:32 | answer | added | Vor | timeline score: 3 | |
May 20, 2012 at 12:32 | history | edited | Raphael |
edited tags
|
|
May 20, 2012 at 11:16 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCompSci/status/204168666797965312 | ||
May 20, 2012 at 10:49 | vote | accept | Phil Wright | ||
May 20, 2012 at 10:49 | |||||
May 20, 2012 at 10:49 | vote | accept | Phil Wright | ||
May 20, 2012 at 10:49 | |||||
May 20, 2012 at 9:25 | answer | added | Raphael | timeline score: 10 | |
May 20, 2012 at 7:54 | history | edited | Dave Clarke | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
May 20, 2012 at 4:12 | comment | added | Kaveh | What do you mean exactly by "parsing"? Do you mean checking if the input is really a regular expression or do you have a more complicated thing in mind, e.g. a machine outputting a description of the corresponding NFA? (if you are not sure if the input is really a regular expression and you need to check it then you need to be able to check that parenthesis are correct and that normally means using a stack.) | |
May 20, 2012 at 4:06 | history | edited | Kaveh |
edited tags
|
|
May 20, 2012 at 3:26 | history | asked | Phil Wright | CC BY-SA 3.0 |