Timeline for Is this a good approach for first attempt to create my own language and compiler?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2014 at 5:21 | answer | added | Jerry101 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 10, 2014 at 16:45 | comment | added | vonbrand | Adding to @Raphael's answer, you'll also inmerse yourself in the complex and technical bits of Stack Overflow. | |
| Mar 9, 2014 at 18:04 | comment | added | Raphael | "more complex and technical than what I'm looking for" -- building a language and a compile is a complex and technical undertaking. Better get used to it. | |
| Mar 8, 2014 at 22:39 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCompSci/status/442429341319045120 | ||
| Mar 8, 2014 at 17:27 | comment | added | vzn | there are many simple/"toy" compilers out on the internet, it might be worth researching/studying them. eg one for Turing machines | |
| Mar 8, 2014 at 17:27 | comment | added | NPElover | @KarolisJuodelė Yeah, the idea is to only try designing a language, intermediate code, and executing the intermediate code using a high level language. I want to spare myself the low-level stuff for now. | |
| Mar 8, 2014 at 17:04 | comment | added | Karolis Juodelė | Sure, why not. Though if you stopped at interpreter, you wouldn't need to worry about storage at all. | |
| Mar 8, 2014 at 16:09 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 8, 2014 at 20:40 | |||||
| Mar 8, 2014 at 15:51 | history | asked | NPElover | CC BY-SA 3.0 |