Timeline for Can bottom-up architectures be effectively programmed in top-down paradigms?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2012 at 8:22 | history | edited | Raphael |
edited tags
|
|
| Aug 2, 2012 at 6:58 | vote | accept | jonsca | ||
| Jul 29, 2012 at 8:27 | answer | added | edA-qa mort-ora-y | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 29, 2012 at 0:46 | comment | added | jonsca | @edA-qamort-ora-y As with James's example, I'm perhaps mildly ignorant of what the general case would be. From my standpoint (someone who is not an experienced software engineer), I see the robotics abstraction as being distinct from the software engineering one, but it seems like you are saying that this distinction is not necessary... In either case, if you'd like to elaborate on your comment as an answer, I would appreciate that too. | |
| Jul 29, 2012 at 0:42 | comment | added | jonsca | @JamesKoppel I have no experience with continuations, so if you'd like to elaborate on that as an answer, I would greatly appreciate it. | |
| Jul 28, 2012 at 19:38 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCompSci/status/229299743312982016 | ||
| Jul 28, 2012 at 19:02 | comment | added | edA-qa mort-ora-y | Is there a particular answer you're looking for? In the general sense the description matches the use of any low-level API in a high-level programming language. What here distinguishes it from this general case? | |
| Jul 28, 2012 at 18:56 | comment | added | James Koppel | I don't fully understand what you're looking for, but I'd expect you can turn any bottom-up design into a top-down one by performing a transformation analogous to CPS conversion. | |
| Jul 28, 2012 at 11:13 | history | edited | Raphael |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 28, 2012 at 5:25 | history | asked | jonsca | CC BY-SA 3.0 |