Timeline for Are DCFLs closed under reversal?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 16, 2020 at 10:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
May 23, 2017 at 12:37 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
Oct 7, 2014 at 22:31 | comment | added | Hendrik Jan | Did H&U overlook reversal for DCFL? They mention non-closure under union, concatenation, Kleene, morphism in Thm 10.5 see Exercise 10.4 (starred but with a solution). However, they note $\{ 0^i1^i2^j\mid i,j\} \cup \{ 0^i1^j2^j\mid i,j\}$ is not DCFL, so neither is $K = \{ 0^i1^i2^ja \mid i,j\} \cup \{ 0^i1^j2^jb\mid i,j\}$ by closure of DCFL under quotient with regular set, Thm 10.2. But the reversal of $K$ is a DCFL, the 'markers' $a$ and $b$ give away the information where to use the pushdown. [ Perhaps @babou can add this if he likes; he is the one collecting the reps here :) ] | |
Oct 7, 2014 at 16:56 | comment | added | Patrick87 | Think of it as a "finder's fee" :) I'm just mystified the system actually works well enough that you found that old post of mine. The system works! Hail SE! | |
Oct 7, 2014 at 14:40 | comment | added | babou | This is absurd. Patrick87 provided the examples, @Raphael did half the editing work, and I get the rep. Then, we get so little for real work ... :) | |
Oct 7, 2014 at 14:08 | history | edited | Raphael | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 454 characters in body
|
Oct 7, 2014 at 13:27 | vote | accept | peteykun | ||
Oct 7, 2014 at 13:22 | history | answered | babou | CC BY-SA 3.0 |