Timeline for What is the difference between the fundamental matrix and the essential matrix?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13 at 12:36 | history | edited | Dima | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Dec 1, 2023 at 18:00 | comment | added | Dima | @JohnD I've tried to clarify my answer. | |
| Dec 1, 2023 at 17:59 | history | edited | Dima | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 248 characters in body
|
| Nov 29, 2023 at 20:54 | comment | added | John D | Does prime mean transpose? Or just a different (newer) matrix? | |
| Nov 18, 2016 at 9:53 | vote | accept | s-low | ||
| Jul 30, 2015 at 13:29 | comment | added | Dima | @s-low, that's correct. | |
| Apr 14, 2015 at 11:09 | comment | added | s-low | Thanks very much @Dima. Your explanation of point correspondences -> fundamental matrix -> essential matrix -> 3D position up-to-scale (under the assumption of known camera intrinsics) is very clear. Would it also be correct to say that in the case of unknown camera calibration, we could compute the fundamental matrix -> camera matrices -> the triangulated 3D position up-to a projective transformation? | |
| Apr 13, 2015 at 15:28 | history | answered | Dima | CC BY-SA 3.0 |