Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 8, 2015 at 20:47 comment added André Souza Lemos The counterexamples I used were my best shot at making the point that your question (again, in my view) is not well formulated. As it is, it might find more rich feedback at philosophy.stackexchange.com.
May 8, 2015 at 20:29 comment added Carl Dong Well, I am just looking for a simple/intuitive example which may make the point clear, not necessarily a rigorous proof.
May 8, 2015 at 20:19 comment added André Souza Lemos Then, I'm sorry to say that (in my view) you don't have an answerable question.
May 8, 2015 at 20:18 comment added Carl Dong I don't know how to define 'human' in this question using precise terms, sorry. I would say just a physical, normal human plus the assumptions made in the question. I know this statement is not quite 'mathematical', but that's all I can say.
May 8, 2015 at 20:15 comment added André Souza Lemos You say that you are not talking about physical computers. Are you talking about human beings as physical (concrete) entities? If that is not the case, then the burden is upon you to express (yes, in mathematical terms) how this abstract computational entity you call "human" functions. As I said, this is not a new subject. Even though it is an extremely complex system, the human brain has been studied as a computational model for a while now.
May 8, 2015 at 16:38 comment added Carl Dong Well, by "mistake" I mean mistakes like writing down the wrong number or reading the wrong characters... That kind of I/O errors
May 8, 2015 at 15:17 history edited André Souza Lemos CC BY-SA 3.0
added 190 characters in body
May 8, 2015 at 15:08 history edited André Souza Lemos CC BY-SA 3.0
added 2 characters in body
May 8, 2015 at 14:57 history answered André Souza Lemos CC BY-SA 3.0