Timeline for Can systems that prevent double-spending (e.g. crypto-currencies) be used to attach other unique data?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2015 at 18:09 | comment | added | derhabicht | @ErikE Added a link to the Bitcoin doc (also changed to "Satoshi's proposal," since I'm not sure "whitepaper" is the most correct term after all). | |
| Aug 20, 2015 at 15:32 | history | edited | derhabicht | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 23 characters in body
|
| Aug 20, 2015 at 15:02 | history | edited | derhabicht | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 72 characters in body
|
| Aug 20, 2015 at 11:18 | comment | added | nanofarad | In practice, the result from a validation network that contains a sizable percentage of malicious peers may differ. In some cases, these peers can keep actions such as movement of a unique piece of content from occurring, while in other cases (such as malicious peers trying to introduce new unique objects) it will cause the honest nodes to begin working on a separate blockchain from the malicious nodes. | |
| Aug 19, 2015 at 21:55 | comment | added | ErikE | How about making "the Bitcoin whitepaper" into a link? | |
| Aug 19, 2015 at 15:47 | review | First posts | |||
| Aug 19, 2015 at 23:52 | |||||
| Aug 19, 2015 at 15:45 | history | answered | derhabicht | CC BY-SA 3.0 |