Timeline for What are predicates of a sentence?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2016 at 12:58 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCompSci/status/717697988349587456 | ||
| Feb 26, 2016 at 14:24 | comment | added | Raphael | The quoted sentence is horrible. I don't understand it either. | |
| Feb 26, 2016 at 14:24 | comment | added | Raphael | We expect references to fulfill the minimal scholarly requirements and be as robust over time as possible. Please take some time to improve your post in this regard. We have collected some advice here. | |
| Feb 26, 2016 at 14:22 | comment | added | Raphael | The title you have chosen is not well suited to representing your question. Please take more care in the future; we have collected some advice here. Thank you! | |
| Feb 26, 2016 at 14:21 | history | edited | Raphael | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited tags
|
| Feb 26, 2016 at 0:20 | vote | accept | juaninf | ||
| Feb 25, 2016 at 19:32 | answer | added | chi | timeline score: 5 | |
| Feb 25, 2016 at 16:09 | comment | added | wvxvw | I can only help with the "stand to" part: this means that if you apply function $R$ to the parts of the sentence, which are not predicates, you will get some constants and functions. If then these constants and functions satisfy the relations you obtain by applying $R$ to the predicates, the statement is true. I cannot think about a specific example, but if you want something easy to imagine: look into analytic geometry. | |
| Feb 25, 2016 at 15:05 | history | asked | juaninf | CC BY-SA 3.0 |