Skip to main content
22 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 27, 2012 at 3:05 comment added Kaveh It might be helpful in reading the question if you state more explicitly what is the output and what you mean by determining a set.
Mar 27, 2012 at 3:04 history edited Kaveh
edited tags
Mar 21, 2012 at 17:01 history edited Raphael CC BY-SA 3.0
added 30 characters in body
Mar 21, 2012 at 16:40 vote accept Thomas
Mar 21, 2012 at 15:43 comment added Thomas Thank you for your comments! I have edited it again in an attempt to make it more clear
Mar 21, 2012 at 15:41 history edited Thomas CC BY-SA 3.0
clarification and more precise description of the problem
Mar 21, 2012 at 14:13 comment added Janoma @Raphael Thanks. So it is just a name for intermediate words that can be derived starting from $S$. In that case, I agree with you that Thomas should edit the question to clarify the notation.
Mar 21, 2012 at 12:34 comment added Raphael @Thomas "In this case, $x,a,y,b$ are non-terminals." -- that does not make sense in the context of $xay \in \mathcal{L}(G)$. Please edit to clarify; maybe it is best to give terminal and non-terminal alphabet explicit names.
Mar 21, 2012 at 12:33 comment added Raphael @Janoma: See here.
S Mar 21, 2012 at 12:16 history suggested uli CC BY-SA 3.0
avoid opening and closing lines
Mar 21, 2012 at 7:09 review Suggested edits
S Mar 21, 2012 at 12:16
Mar 21, 2012 at 1:52 comment added Janoma What are the sentential forms of $G$?
Mar 21, 2012 at 1:02 comment added Alex ten Brink Firstly, if the $x$ and $y$ in your first sentence are different from the $x$ and $y$ in the set definition, it might not be a bad idea to name them differently, to avoid confusion. Secondly, are you sure that you don't mean that $x$, $y$ and $a$ are strings of non-terminals? Thirdly, you say $a$ is a non-terminal, but later you consider the case that $a$ is a character, but characters=terminals; are you sure it's what you mean this way? I have an answer almost ready, just checking if I get your question :)
Mar 21, 2012 at 0:30 comment added Thomas I hope that I didn't change the question too much - it has a slightly different nature now.
Mar 21, 2012 at 0:29 history edited Thomas CC BY-SA 3.0
Trying to make the question more precise; However this changes the question a bit.
Mar 21, 2012 at 0:22 comment added Thomas @Raphael - I'm trying to automate transformations of L-System grammars... so it's not in normal form. In fact I will edit this question again to make it more precise.
Mar 21, 2012 at 0:17 comment added Thomas @AlextenBrink - $x$ and $y$ are arbitrary strings. I'm just looking at a fragment/substring.
Mar 20, 2012 at 23:16 answer added Alex ten Brink timeline score: 6
Mar 20, 2012 at 23:07 comment added Raphael Can we assume the grammar is in any normal form or does it have to work for arbitrary ones?
Mar 20, 2012 at 23:03 history edited Raphael CC BY-SA 3.0
clearing up notation
Mar 20, 2012 at 23:01 comment added Raphael What is your application? Are you building a parser?
Mar 20, 2012 at 22:55 history asked Thomas CC BY-SA 3.0