Timeline for Goldbach Conjecture and Busy Beaver numbers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 18, 2017 at 11:09 | answer | added | Michael | timeline score: 1 | |
Dec 1, 2016 at 5:45 | answer | added | usul | timeline score: 0 | |
Nov 30, 2016 at 18:34 | answer | added | vzn | timeline score: 9 | |
Nov 29, 2016 at 22:31 | comment | added | vzn | your question gets to the heart of mathematical proofs which generally manage to convert infinite properties into finite logical statements. "how this happens" is still under study. hes also pointing out the correspondence of undecidable problems to open mathematical problems, there is nearly a 1-1 correspondence for all open mathematical conjectures. (might cook this into answer with refs sometime if there is interest eg expr via upvotes). also more discussion in Computer Science Chat & my blog etc | |
Nov 27, 2016 at 0:01 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCompSci/status/802663690013212676 | ||
Nov 26, 2016 at 14:53 | comment | added | hardmath | Keep in mind that all formal proofs consist of a finite number of steps, whether they concern "a statement about infinitely many numbers" or not. In this hypothetical situation the claim depends on "knowing" an upper bound on how many even numbers have to be checked to verify (or contradict) Goldbach's conjecture. | |
Nov 26, 2016 at 6:53 | answer | added | Eugene | timeline score: 9 | |
Nov 26, 2016 at 6:36 | answer | added | André Souza Lemos | timeline score: 11 | |
Nov 26, 2016 at 5:11 | comment | added | Ovi | @Evil I would think it's possible that some mathematical conjectures are still unresolved because their proposed proofs rely on a finite (yet unfathomably large) number of calculations. I just wanted to check that this wasn't the case with the Goldbach conjecture. | |
Nov 26, 2016 at 4:35 | review | First posts | |||
Nov 26, 2016 at 13:18 | |||||
Nov 26, 2016 at 4:34 | history | asked | Ovi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |