Timeline for Iteration can replace Recursion?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2023 at 14:48 | history | edited | Paŭlo Ebermann | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fix link to implementation
|
| Dec 27, 2016 at 5:02 | comment | added | Tobi Alafin | Thanks for taking the effort to write the requested program. | |
| Dec 26, 2016 at 21:41 | comment | added | David Richerby | I think this is an important point. You've shown quite explicitly that recursion is nothing special and that it can be removed just by keeping track of the call stack yourself, rather than letting the compiler do it. Recursion is just a compiler feature that makes writing this kind of program easier. | |
| Dec 26, 2016 at 21:15 | history | edited | Paŭlo Ebermann | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
a lot simpler version, saving the type distinction in the stack.
|
| Dec 26, 2016 at 20:54 | history | edited | Paŭlo Ebermann | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fix missing subscript
|
| Dec 26, 2016 at 20:46 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 26, 2016 at 23:36 | |||||
| Dec 26, 2016 at 20:42 | history | answered | Paŭlo Ebermann | CC BY-SA 3.0 |