Timeline for Does it make sense to have both the concept of 'null' and 'Maybe'?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2017 at 9:10 | history | edited | coredump | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 27 characters in body
|
| Jan 4, 2017 at 9:05 | history | edited | coredump | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 107 characters in body
|
| Jan 1, 2017 at 11:53 | history | edited | coredump | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 6 characters in body
|
| Dec 31, 2016 at 19:28 | history | edited | coredump | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 43 characters in body
|
| Dec 31, 2016 at 8:19 | history | edited | coredump | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 405 characters in body
|
| Dec 31, 2016 at 7:56 | history | edited | coredump | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 440 characters in body
|
| Dec 30, 2016 at 22:44 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' |
Actually, it's important that Maybe (Maybe X) is not the same thing as Maybe X. Nothing is not the same thing as Just Nothing. Conflating Maybe (Maybe X) with Maybe X makes it impossible to treat Maybe _ polymorphically.
|
|
| Dec 30, 2016 at 17:09 | history | edited | coredump | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 444 characters in body
|
| Dec 30, 2016 at 16:25 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 30, 2016 at 17:03 | |||||
| Dec 30, 2016 at 16:22 | history | answered | coredump | CC BY-SA 3.0 |