Timeline for Why does the program counter increment before an instruction is completed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2019 at 12:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCompSci/status/1191324374328127489 | ||
| Nov 4, 2019 at 9:48 | answer | added | gnasher729 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 22, 2017 at 17:57 | vote | accept | Philip Eagles | ||
| Jan 22, 2017 at 14:33 | answer | added | Peter Camilleri | timeline score: 11 | |
| S Jan 18, 2017 at 0:02 | history | edited | David Richerby | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
copy-edit
|
| S Jan 18, 2017 at 0:02 | history | suggested | soundslikeodd | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
general structure
|
| Jan 17, 2017 at 20:46 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 18, 2017 at 0:02 | |||||
| Jan 17, 2017 at 19:36 | comment | added | Yuval Filmus | They probably all copied from each other. | |
| Jan 17, 2017 at 19:35 | comment | added | Philip Eagles | @YuvalFilmus I see. I had just assumed that it was there because of it being the same across the two A level computing specifications I've seen (both in the UK), as well as a few websites which I had gone on. | |
| Jan 17, 2017 at 19:31 | comment | added | Yuval Filmus | I bet not all "implementations" of the fetch-execute cycle conform to this pseudocode. The exact place where the program counter is incremented seems completely arbitrary. Whoever wrote your textbook had to put it somewhere. | |
| Jan 17, 2017 at 19:13 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 17, 2017 at 19:31 | |||||
| Jan 17, 2017 at 19:11 | history | asked | Philip Eagles | CC BY-SA 3.0 |