Timeline for Do formulas involving fewer repetitions of variables give higher numerical precision?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2018 at 22:20 | vote | accept | nalzok | ||
| Jan 21, 2017 at 8:03 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCompSci/status/822716155299266560 | ||
| Jan 18, 2017 at 18:09 | comment | added | David Richerby | I didn't really understand your original title (I thought it had something to do with probability) so I edited. Please feel free to revert if you think your title was better than mine! | |
| Jan 18, 2017 at 18:08 | history | edited | David Richerby | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Title
|
| Jan 18, 2017 at 17:56 | answer | added | Derek Elkins left SE | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 18, 2017 at 16:56 | comment | added | nalzok | @YuvalFilmus In my understanding, "repeat" means "appear more than once" in this exercise. Both R1 and R2 appear twice in the first formula, and only once in the second one, so the second formula is "such a form that no variable that represents an uncertain number is repeated" | |
| Jan 18, 2017 at 16:36 | comment | added | Yuval Filmus | By repeated, do you mean multiplied? | |
| Jan 18, 2017 at 14:22 | history | edited | nalzok | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 81 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Jan 18, 2017 at 14:08 | history | asked | nalzok | CC BY-SA 3.0 |