Timeline for Calculating Binet's formula for Fibonacci numbers with arbitrary precision
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 31, 2012 at 19:54 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCompSci/status/285836439063769088 | ||
Dec 6, 2012 at 1:53 | vote | accept | vzn | ||
Dec 6, 2012 at 1:53 | vote | accept | vzn | ||
Dec 6, 2012 at 1:53 | |||||
Dec 4, 2012 at 16:00 | comment | added | vzn | I think @adrianNs comment is closest to my interest. maybe am thinking of a scheme that carries/"remembers" the known uncertainty of all the terms & then gives the final result to the desired/specified uncertainty. or specifically a scheme that guarantees the "nth" (incl fractional) bit of the answer is correct for any "n" given prior to calculation. also if a larger "n" is desired than previously, an answer that builds on the prior result, sort of like a streaming algorithm.... ideally using some general scheme that would be applicable to other similar formulas.... | |
Dec 4, 2012 at 8:56 | answer | added | Hendrik Jan | timeline score: 4 | |
Dec 4, 2012 at 8:42 | comment | added | adrianN | What do you mean by 'no roundoff error'? If you use finite precision you will always have to do some rounding, but for large enough precision the rounding result will always be correct. | |
Dec 4, 2012 at 7:12 | comment | added | Sasho Nikolov | anything wrong with keeping enough precision so that the roundoff error is <1/2 and then rounding to the nearest integer? | |
Dec 4, 2012 at 4:02 | history | edited | Juho | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body; edited title
|
Dec 4, 2012 at 3:33 | history | asked | vzn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |