Timeline for Why is there no regularity condition in case 1 of the master theorem?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2017 at 22:59 | comment | added | Yuval Filmus | @Raphael My answer addresses all these points. | |
| Aug 27, 2017 at 20:26 | comment | added | Raphael | Questions of the form, "why is additional requirement X needed for proving Y?" are not always fruitful. The answer may just be, "because we couldn't make the proof work without it". There may be other proofs. | |
| Aug 27, 2017 at 20:24 | history | edited | Raphael |
edited tags
|
|
| Aug 27, 2017 at 18:41 | history | edited | David Richerby | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
"master", not "Master's"
|
| Aug 27, 2017 at 18:41 | comment | added | David Richerby | Note that it's "the master theorem". It's not named after some guy called Professor Master. Also, please state explicitly what version of the theorem you're using. Different people write the theorem different ways and your "case 3" could easily be somebody else's "case b". | |
| Aug 27, 2017 at 12:47 | answer | added | Yuval Filmus | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 27, 2017 at 12:34 | history | edited | Yuval Filmus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
| Aug 27, 2017 at 11:36 | review | First posts | |||
| Aug 27, 2017 at 12:34 | |||||
| Aug 27, 2017 at 11:35 | history | asked | Ahmad Naseem | CC BY-SA 3.0 |