Skip to main content
added 72 characters in body
Source Link
Fusho
  • 171
  • 6

Without more information about f and g, this problem is NP-hard to solve. The topic is quite broad, check the family of Branch and Bound algorithms, depending of additional information you can do better than NP-hard, in particular, it makes use of monotonicity to guide its search.

Worth to mention too are Genetic algorithms and Simulated Annealing, which, in general, gives you a good enough solution.

Without more information about f and g, this problem is NP-hard to solve. The topic is quite broad, check the family of Branch and Bound algorithms, depending of additional information you can do better than NP-hard, in particular, it makes use of monotonicity to guide its search.

Without more information about f and g, this problem is NP-hard to solve. The topic is quite broad, check the family of Branch and Bound algorithms, depending of additional information you can do better than NP-hard, in particular, it makes use of monotonicity to guide its search.

Worth to mention too are Genetic algorithms and Simulated Annealing, which, in general, gives you a good enough solution.

deleted 56 characters in body
Source Link
Fusho
  • 171
  • 6

Without more information about f and g, this problem is NP-hard to solve. The topic is quite broad, check the family of Branch and Bound algorithms, depending of additional information you can do better than NP-hard (however, I am not confident enough to tell you that monotonicity is of any value at using this methodsin particular, but I think so)it makes use of monotonicity to guide its search.

Without more information about f and g, this problem is NP-hard to solve. The topic is quite broad, check the family of Branch and Bound algorithms, depending of additional information you can do better than NP-hard (however, I am not confident enough to tell you that monotonicity is of any value at using this methods, but I think so).

Without more information about f and g, this problem is NP-hard to solve. The topic is quite broad, check the family of Branch and Bound algorithms, depending of additional information you can do better than NP-hard, in particular, it makes use of monotonicity to guide its search.

Source Link
Fusho
  • 171
  • 6

Without more information about f and g, this problem is NP-hard to solve. The topic is quite broad, check the family of Branch and Bound algorithms, depending of additional information you can do better than NP-hard (however, I am not confident enough to tell you that monotonicity is of any value at using this methods, but I think so).