Timeline for Why can't we say that NP is closed under complement given that we can say it is closed under intersection
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 16, 2020 at 10:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
Jan 6, 2018 at 14:02 | comment | added | Yuval Filmus | When defining NL using this model, you'll have to restrict access to the guess tape – say the head only moves to the right. But this subtlety doesn't arise when defining NP. | |
Jan 6, 2018 at 14:01 | comment | added | Albert Hendriks | It's an interesting model. Notice that in this model NL=NP, which is generally considered false in most models. | |
Jan 6, 2018 at 5:56 | history | edited | Yuval Filmus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
Jan 6, 2018 at 5:55 | comment | added | Yuval Filmus | Yes, $M'$ passes its witness to $M$. Of course, this doesn't compute the complement language, which is precisely the point. | |
Jan 6, 2018 at 5:48 | comment | added | Albert Hendriks | (assuming $M'=M^c$) "The machine $M′$ accepts an input $x$ if there exist a string $y$ such that when running $M$ on $x$ with $y$ on the guess tape, it rejects." -> I find this very hard to understand. I'd think: The machine $M′$ accepts an input $x$ if for all strings $y$ such that when running $M$ on $x$ with $y$ on the guess tape, it rejects. Or does $M'$ pass $y$ to $M$? That would be new for me. | |
Jan 5, 2018 at 12:11 | history | answered | Yuval Filmus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |