Timeline for What $O$ -symbol supresses?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2018 at 4:01 | answer | added | clark | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 16, 2018 at 10:32 | vote | accept | Umang.B | ||
| Jan 17, 2018 at 3:17 | |||||
| Jan 16, 2018 at 9:27 | answer | added | David Richerby | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 16, 2018 at 8:56 | comment | added | Umang.B | Oh! I guess he is giving vague idea about O-Symbol. I don't know should I ask you more?? Book on page 3 he talks about that. | |
| Jan 16, 2018 at 8:51 | comment | added | Raphael | Arguably, this passage is wrong, at least if de Bruijn uses the common definition of O. There is a limit process involved, and more than a single number is suppressed. | |
| Jan 16, 2018 at 8:50 | comment | added | Raphael | It's not a definition. Look at the definition. | |
| Jan 16, 2018 at 8:31 | history | asked | Umang.B | CC BY-SA 3.0 |