Timeline for What $O$ -symbol supresses?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2018 at 4:07 | comment | added | Umang.B | Oh you have changed your answer, thanks!! Yesterday, I got confuse. | |
| Jan 17, 2018 at 3:14 | comment | added | Umang.B | $lim_{x \rightarrow +\infty} x+1/x = x$ is like saying that R.H.S x is nothing but range on some domain. It is still a value and not a function (or variable) | |
| Jan 16, 2018 at 13:46 | history | edited | David Richerby | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 292 characters in body
|
| Jan 16, 2018 at 12:28 | comment | added | Umang.B | I am sorry to bother you further but I post that part on stackexchange math and over there they ridicule it.here | |
| Jan 16, 2018 at 12:26 | comment | added | David Richerby | Oh, does he not accept things like $\lim_{x\to\infty}x+1/x=x$? | |
| Jan 16, 2018 at 12:12 | comment | added | Umang.B | But limit of a function is a number (constant), how it can be a another function? | |
| Jan 16, 2018 at 11:13 | comment | added | David Richerby | Cormen, Rivest, Lieserson and Stein is the usual recommendation. | |
| Jan 16, 2018 at 11:10 | comment | added | Umang.B | Can you refer me a nice book where I can learn Algorithm with lots of Math? | |
| Jan 16, 2018 at 11:08 | comment | added | David Richerby | Yeah, maybe there's some context that makes de Bruijn's comments more sensible but, in isolation, they're very disappointing from such a major figure in mathematics. | |
| Jan 16, 2018 at 10:35 | comment | added | Umang.B | But check this out reference under see reference section. I guess, this guy's book is famous or something. de Bruijn, N. G. Asymptotic Methods in Analysis. New York: Dover, pp. 3-10, 1981. | |
| Jan 16, 2018 at 10:32 | vote | accept | Umang.B | ||
| Jan 17, 2018 at 3:17 | |||||
| Jan 16, 2018 at 9:27 | history | answered | David Richerby | CC BY-SA 3.0 |