Timeline for How did they cancel out O-terms in this fraction?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2018 at 10:36 | comment | added | Yuval Filmus | Yes, for the OP it makes sense. But others that may reach this question are better off with an answer more appropriate for their stage. So it's good that there are several answers suitable for several levels of expertise. | |
| Feb 25, 2018 at 9:00 | comment | added | Raphael | Since we apparently have a learner here, we seem to agree that the "pedantic" approach is the most suitable. | |
| Feb 25, 2018 at 8:49 | comment | added | Yuval Filmus | What you call the rigorous route is really a pedantic route, which is mostly useful when just learning Landau notation. The correct attitude (in my opinion) is the one in the answer by ShreevatsaR. | |
| Feb 24, 2018 at 21:42 | comment | added | Raphael | Explaining O-juggling with more O-juggling -- even though you explain the steps, I can't approve. The rigorous route is not more complicated or harder. | |
| Feb 24, 2018 at 21:30 | vote | accept | Bite Bytes | ||
| Feb 24, 2018 at 21:22 | history | answered | Yuval Filmus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |