3
$\begingroup$

How do we determine minimum $k$ such that $G$ is a strong $LL(k)$ Grammar

Like for grammar $G$ with the following rules $S\rightarrow aAcaa \mid bAbcc,A\rightarrow a \mid ab \mid \epsilon$

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

I do not believe one can obtain directly a minimum $k$ such that $G$ is a strong $LL(k)$ grammar. However, as it is possible to (dis)prove that a grammar is strong $LL(k)$, one can iterate the proof over $k$.

A grammar $G$ is strong $LL(k)$ iff for every pair of distinct production rules $A \to \alpha$ and $A \to \beta$ (with $\alpha \neq \beta$), we have:

$$ First_k( \alpha \; Follow_k(A) ) \; \cap \; First_k( \beta \; Follow_k(A) ) = \emptyset $$

The steps to obtain a $k$ for a certain grammar $G$ are thus as follows:

  • For each $n > 0$:
    1. Check wether $G$ is $LL(n)$
    2. If so, try proving $G$ is $LL(n)$
    3. If not, we have found our $k = n - 1$

Some documents that might help with the actual proof:

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.