1
$\begingroup$

Given two sets $S_1$ and $S_2$ of $n$ elements each and a capacity $C$. Each element in $S_i$ ($i=1,2$) has a weight $w_{ij}$ for $j=1,2,\ldots,n$. From each set $S_i$ ($i=1,2$), choose a subset $O_i\subseteq S_i$, where $\sum_{j\in O_i}w_{ij}\leq C$, in order to minimize the following function :

$$|O_2|-|O_1|+2|O_1\backslash O_2|-3|O_1\cup O_2|.$$

Can we solve this problem in polytime?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I don't think so. Maximizing the number of items subject to knapsack constraints is not hard, isn't it? $\endgroup$ – zdm Feb 6 at 17:54
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ It might be cleaner to state this as maximizing $2|O_1| + 2|O_2| - |O_1 \cap O_2|$. That's equivalent, and the function to minimize/maximize is less messy. $\endgroup$ – D.W. Feb 6 at 18:00
  • $\begingroup$ How did you reformulate it? @D.W. $\endgroup$ – zdm Feb 6 at 18:05
  • $\begingroup$ That's just an identity on sets: $$|O_2|-|O_1|+2|O_1\backslash O_2|-3|O_1\cup O_2| = - (2|O_1| + 2|O_2| - |O_1 \cap O_2|)$$ (this can be proven by writing down a Venn diagram, introducing three variables for $|O_1\setminus O_2|$, $|O_2\setminus O_1$, and $|O_1 \cap O_2|$, and expressing everything in terms of those three variables). Now minimizing $-\psi$ is always equivalent to maximizing $\psi$, for any expression $\psi$. $\endgroup$ – D.W. Feb 6 at 18:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @j_random_hacker when we choose the elements of $S_2$ as you suggested, my problem becomes equivalent to maximizing the number of items to put in the knapsack subject to the weights constraints, which i think is not hard. $\endgroup$ – zdm Feb 7 at 10:59

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.