I am reading about a method called guided backpropagation. https://ramprs.github.io/2017/01/21/Grad-CAM-Making-Off-the-Shelf-Deep-Models-Transparent-through-Visual-Explanations.html#deconv-and-guided-backprop.
As shown in the figure below, you essentially compute the derivates of the output with respect to the input image while zero-ing out negative gradients along the way. The website mentions
Negative gradients at a particular ReLU neuron, state that this neuron has a negative influence on the class that we are trying to visualize.
During backpropagation there are paths that have positive influence and some that have negative influence, and these end up cancelling out in a weird interference pattern, causing gradients to seem noisy. Whereas in Guided Backpropagation, we only keep paths that lead to positive influence on the class score, and supress the ones that have negative influence, leading to much cleaner looking images.
My question is why does the resulting image have pixels which are negative? Don't negative pixels indicate that the gradient of the output with respect to the pixel is negative? I.e. that pixel has a negative influence on the class score?