# Minimum words in a string given a dictionary

The question is: Given a dictionary consisting of a set of words and a string: find the minimum number of words the string can be split into. If the string can not be decomposed into a list of words return -1.

I tried finding the longest prefix and proceeding but that doesn't seem to work. I searched this question online and found a similar stack exchange question but I believe that the solution provided is wrong. It looks like this person is finding the longest suffix and proceeding but this approach doesn't work. Link to similar question

The reason this doesn't work is because: Suppose the dictionary is:{i,iiiiface,facebook,book} and input instance is 'iiiiifacebook'. The given solution would select 'facebook' and then continue to select 5 'i's' making a total of 6 words when infact the optimal solution is: (book,iiiiface,i) which is just 3 words. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

• Have you tried dynamic programming? cs.stackexchange.com/tags/dynamic-programming/info
– D.W.
Oct 19, 2019 at 3:11
• Your question isn't completely clear. It seems to me that you are given a mapping $h\colon \Sigma \to \Delta^*$ and a string $y \in \Delta^*$, and your goal is to find a shortest string $x \in \Sigma^*$ such that $h(x) = y$. Oct 19, 2019 at 8:02
• Just imagine u have a physical dictionary. And you have an arbitrary string: $x \in \Sigma^*$. if that string can be SPLIT into a list of meaningful words return the minimum possible splits (i.e: the minimum possible number of words). If the string can not be split into a list of meaningful words from the dictionary return -1
– Sid
Oct 19, 2019 at 12:40

One possible approach to solve this problem is as follows:-

(1) Create a trie of the dictionary for fast matching.

(2) Create a recursive function that does the following:-

(a) Finds all possible prefixes of the current string that are present in the dictionary.

(b) Calls itself recursively with those prefixes removed

Example:-

Word:- keyboardrocks
Dictionary:- {key,keyboard,keyboardrock,s,board}

f(keyboardrocks)->f(boardrocks)
->f(rocks)
->f(s)


(c) Recurse until the string is reduced to an empty string.

(d) The minimum recursion depth will be the required answer.

What can be done to better the runtime complexity?

You can use memoization to remember the minimum number of words that were needed to construct a prefix of length m of the string in an array.

So now, MinWord[1,n]=MinWord[1,x]+findMinWord[x,n]


Let the string be $$S_1,\ldots,S_n$$. For every $$m$$, find the minimum number of words that $$S_1,\ldots,S_m$$ can be split into. I'll let you work out the remaining details.