2
$\begingroup$

I wonder if there exists language-agnostic data structure notation. Preferably a standard, allowing to describe data structures and basic data types. e.g. something like a subset of WebIDL.

A motivation is to describe data structures (a model) in a way that is standardized and language-agnostic. Then have a set of mappings of those data structures into various representations (XML, JSON, YAML)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ (XML doesn't exclude (programming) language agnostic in my book.) $\endgroup$ – greybeard Sep 9 '20 at 6:32
  • $\begingroup$ @greybeard Thank you, but the question is not about XML capabilities. Let's suppose I want to use XML to represent just data. $\endgroup$ – filip26 Sep 10 '20 at 16:47
1
$\begingroup$

In terms of notation:

  • Isn't XSD exactly what you are looking for? (barring all the "severe criticism" ...). Also not sure if you are looking for a notation convenient to hand-write, that's certainly NOT XML :-).
  • Typedefs and preserves seem to have more of a mathematical basis, perhaps closer to what you are looking for. A related HN thread.

I suspect you already know a lot of these projects, usually the focus is in serialization:

Investigating this space I found Arrow, "a language-independent columnar memory format" for sharing memory between programs, with libraries for a dozen of languages. Turns out it uses flatbuffers under the hood.

Now that I came up with this list and I suspect you may be familiar with a lot of them, perhaps will be useful to know in which way the thing you are looking for is different. I think the keyword "notation" on your question is the key.

Cheers!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ That's a great summary! Thank you. $\endgroup$ – filip26 Nov 26 '20 at 10:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.