$\DeclareMathOperator\s{size}\def\f#1{\lfloor#1\rfloor}\def\c#1{\lceil#1\rceil}$As already pointed out by gnasher729, the statement is not literally true when $n\equiv1\pmod3$: if $n=3k+1$, there are binary trees of size $n$ whose all subtrees have size either $\le k<n/3$ or $\ge2k+1>2n/3$.
A version suitable for all $n$ can be proved as follows. Let $\s(u)$ denote the size of the subtree rooted at $u$.
Lemma 1: If $1\le s\le n$, then every binary tree of size $n$ has a node $u$ such that $s\le\s(u)\le2s-1$.
Proof: Let $u$ be a node with $\s(u)\ge s$ such that $\s(u)$ is minimal possible. By minimality, the child subtrees of $u$ have size $\le s-1$ each, hence $\s(u)\le2(s-1)+1=2s-1$. QED
Balancing $\s(u)$ and its complement, we obtain the following.
Corollary 2: In every binary tree of size $n>1$,
there is a node $u$ such that $\f{(n+1)/3}\le\s(u)\le\f{(2n-1)/3}$, and
there is a node $u$ such that $\c{n/3}\le\s(u)\le\f{(2n+1)/3}$.
Proof: Using Lemma 1 with $s=\f{(n+1)/3}$, we have $2s-1\le\f{(2n+2)/3}-1=\f{(2n-1)/3}$. Likewise, $2\c{n/3}-1=2\f{(n+2)/3}-1\le\f{(2n+4)/3}-1=\f{(2n+1)/3}$. QED
We can also reformulate it as follows:
Corollary 3: Every binary tree of size $n>1$ has a subtree such that both the subtree and its complement have sizes between $\f{(n+1)/3}$ and $\f{(2n+1)/3}$.
Proof: Taking $u$ with $\f{(n+1)/3}\le\s(u)\le\f{(2n-1)/3}$ by Corollary 2, the complement of the subtree rooted at $u$ has size between $n-\f{(2n-1)/3}=\c{(n+1)/3}=\f{n/3}+1$ and $n-\f{(n+1)/3}=\c{(2n-1)/3}=\f{(2n+1)/3}$. QED
Using Corollary 2, the simple bound $n/3\le\s(u)<2n/3$ works if $n\equiv0,2\pmod3$. It also works for all $n$ if the tree is full:
Corollary 4: Every binary tree of size $n>1$ such that all nodes have $0$ or $2$ children has a node $u$ such that $n/3\le\s(u)<2n/3$.
Proof: In this case, the size of every subtree (including $n$ itself) is odd. By Corollary 2, there is $u$ with $\f{(n+1)/3}\le\s(u)\le\f{(2n-1)/3}<2n/3$. If $\f{(n+1)/3}\ge n/3$, we are done. The remaining case is that $\f{(n+1)/3}=(n-1)/3$. But here $n-1$ is even, hence $(n-1)/3$ is also even, while $\s(u)$ is odd. Thus $\s(u)\ge1+(n-1)/3>n/3$. QED