0
$\begingroup$

When resolving in Conflict driven clause learning, it is the case that if you resolve a conflicting clause with the reason of the negation of one of his literals, then this results in another conflicting clause. Could someone explain to me why this is the case?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$

0

Reset to default

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.