0
$\begingroup$

I'm taking a course about the formality of programming languages and while reading Semantics with Applications: An Appetizer by H.R Nielson and F. Nielson I came across the following exercise: enter image description here

I'm referring to the last statement - I managed to proof that the statement is semantically equivalent using the Natural Operational Semantics but failed to prove using Structural Operational Semantics.

EDIT: This is the sense the exercise refers to enter image description here

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Please clarify what "in the sense above" means exactly. What have you tried? $\endgroup$
    – Kai
    Dec 7, 2022 at 18:04
  • $\begingroup$ I added the sense. So far I tried to use the derivation sequences to deduce that S1, S2 and S3 all have derivation sequences and than use those to compose a derivation tree for S1;(S2;S3) but with no success $\endgroup$ Dec 7, 2022 at 18:22

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.