1
$\begingroup$

let's say that I have a Python script that performs various operations, including data manipulation, conditional logic, and iteration. However, I'm concerned about its time and space complexity efficiency. Would it be possible to use logic gates to optimize code by simplifying and reducing redundant logic using techniques like Karnaugh Maps (K-Maps) or transforming the script into a logic gate representation and then optimizing it?

I'm curious if it's feasible to take a complex Python script translate all the raw machine code operations it does and simplify it using logic gates to achieve the most efficient time and space complexity possible. Are there any specific strategies or tools that can help in this process? How would one transform a Python script into a logic gate representation, and what steps are involved in optimizing it? Additionally, are there any limitations or trade-offs to consider when using this approach? Any insights or examples would be greatly appreciated!

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

0
$\begingroup$

How much money do you have?

There is at the moment no technology that could create configurable hardware that is faster than a general purpose CPU. (Improving configurable hardware would improve the general purpose CpU as well).

Apple has improved existing CPUs, I'd say that cost them maybe ten billion dollars. That’s why I asked “how much money do you have”.

If you want Python to run faster, translate it manually into C or C++, or build a compiler that is specialised. If you don’t need the generality of Python most of the time, just-in-time compilers can do very well. But if you want to build hardware, that will cost you. Probably the first step wouldn’t be asking on stackexchange but finding the first 20 million dollars and hire 100 people to work on finding a solution full time.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Python is an imperative language, meaning any operation can have side effects. This makes such "gate level" thinking tricky. Its written in a way such that there's no issue with a block of memory being the name of a person at one point and becoming a control flow variable in the next.

This means any attempt to convert it into the raw gates has to be done with a sense of time ordering to it. You can't just start by converting into gates by digging down into how the machine code works beacuse you would need to solve too large of a problem. If you have 100 billion transistors on a chip, you need to model a system to reproduce an arbitrary interweaving of 100 billion transistors per CPU cycle, easily leading into the large numbers we typically don't use in English, like septililon.

Its tricky to reduce this because Python and the machine language code were designed from a particular reduction already: the reuse of those 100 billion transistors in a well controlled manner governed by a CPU clock. You would be hard pressed to come up with a more efficient mapping than the one they were designed for.

You might have better luck with functional languages, like Haskell. They provide a structure for side effects from day 1 (they forbid them, forcing you to cleverly specify all side effects as return values).

But in the end, if you want to get down to gates, the correct way to do so is to use a language designed for that in the first place, such as VHDL.

That's not to say there's not optimizations to be had. We have many optimization tools available. But they optimize to their strong point: they optimize to operation on a CPU, rather than a generic lattice of gates.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.