0
$\begingroup$

I want to construct a depth $\mathrm{poly}(n)$ circuit computing $$f(x) = \text{first }n\text{ bit string with circuit complexity }\sqrt n$$ where $x \in \{0, 1\}^n$. I see how to do it with depth $2^n$ (have a level enumerating circuits of size at most $\sqrt n$ and OR their truth tables; then you can use AND gates to find the first OR that is a 0) but I can't get down to $\mathrm{poly}(n)$. Anyone see how?

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Can you edit your question to include what definition you are using of what it means for a string $s$ to have circuit complexity $c$? $\endgroup$
    – D.W.
    Commented Sep 4 at 21:16
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I think this might be trivial. The way you phrased your question, the answer only depends on the length of the input. In a non-uniform model, you only need circuits of depth 1: for each input size $n$, the circuit $C_n$ can ignore the input and hard-codes the output. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 5 at 3:46
  • $\begingroup$ It seems to me you are confusing size and depth. I can't fully follow you description, but any sensible way of computing in parallel the truth tables of all circuits of size $\sqrt n$ in $\log n$ variables and then the lexicographically smallest among the results will have size $n^{O(\sqrt n)}$, but depth only $n^{O(1)}$. E.g., compute the $n$ output bits one by one. In fact, you can make it depth $O(\sqrt n(\log n)^2)$ or so: the smaller of two strings can be computed by a circuit of depth $O(\log n)$; arrange these into a balanced binary tree. I'm assuming fan-in 2 circuits, otherwise ... $\endgroup$ Commented yesterday
  • $\begingroup$ ... it's even more trivial. And this gives a uniform sequence of circuits; for a nonuniform sequence, you can trivially do it in depth 1 and size $n$, as Benjamin Kuykendall wrote. $\endgroup$ Commented yesterday

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.