A problem is decidable if there is a TM which decides instances of the problem.
Given two arbitrary CFGs $G_1$ and $G_2$, we know this for certain: either $L(G_1) = L(G_2)$, or $L(G_1) \neq L(G_2)$. Consider the first case: a TM that accepts on the input $(G_1, G_2)$ correctly decides this problem. Consider the second case: a TM that rejects on the input $(G_1, G_2)$ would be correct in that case.
Now, consider a finite set of grammars $\{G_1, G_2, ..., G_n\}$. For any two grammars $G_i$ and $G_j$ in this set, we know that either $L(G_i) = L(G_j)$ or $L(G_i) \neq L(G_j)$.
Consider the following TMs:
TM #1:
if input is (G_1, G_1) then accept
if input is (G_1, G_2) then accept
...
if input is (G_n, G_n) then accept
TM #2:
if input is (G_1, G_1) then accept
if input is (G_1, G_2) then accept
...
if input is (G_n, G_n) then reject
...
TM #N
if input is (G_1, G_1) then reject
if input is (G_1, G_2) then reject
...
if input is (G_n, G_n) then reject
Each TM can either accept or reject for each of the $n^2$ (ordered) inputs; so there are $N = 2^{n^2}$ different TMs (as many as binary strings of length $n^2$).
One of these TMs is guaranteed to correctly decide your problem. I can't tell you which one, but one of these gives all the correct answers. Since there is a TM for your problem, it's decidable.