Adding a Wikipedia link for more depth on the "original" Turing Test.There are many tests called "Turing test". Wikipedia mentions "at least 3 primary versions". The test passed by Eugeene is none of those 3. The test passed by Eugeene was not devised by Alan Turing, but it was a test called Turing test, inspired by Alan Turing, and Eugeene did pass it.
The part mentioning at least 3 primary versions of the Turing test:
Saul Traiger argues that there are at least three primary versions of
the Turing test, two of which are offered in "Computing Machinery and
Intelligence" and one that he describes as the "Standard
Interpretation." While there is some debate regarding whether the
"Standard Interpretation" is that described by Turing or, instead,
based on a misreading of his paper, these three versions are not
regarded as equivalent, and their strengths and weaknesses are
distinct.
Version 1
Turing's original game described a simple party game involving three
players. Player A is a man, player B is a woman and player C (who
plays the role of the interrogator) is of either sex. In the Imitation
Game, player C is unable to see either player A or player B, and can
communicate with them only through written notes. By asking questions
of player A and player B, player C tries to determine which of the two
is the man and which is the woman. Player A's role is to trick the
interrogator into making the wrong decision, while player B attempts
to assist the interrogator in making the right one.
Version 2
The second version appeared later in Turing's 1950 paper. Similar to
the Original Imitation Game Test, the role of player A is performed by
a computer. However, the role of player B is performed by a man rather
than a woman. [...] In this version, both player A (the computer) and
player B are trying to trick the interrogator into making an incorrect
decision.
Version 3
Common understanding has it that the purpose of the Turing Test is not
specifically to determine whether a computer is able to fool an
interrogator into believing that it is a human, but rather whether a
computer could imitate a human. While there is some dispute whether
this interpretation was intended by Turing – Sterrett believes that it
was and thus conflates the second version with this one, while
others, such as Traiger, do not – this has nevertheless led to
what can be viewed as the "standard interpretation." In this version,
player A is a computer and player B a person of either sex. The role
of the interrogator is not to determine which is male and which is
female, but which is a computer and which is a human. The
fundamental issue with the standard interpretation is that the
interrogator cannot differentiate which responder is human, and which
is machine. There are issues about duration, but the standard
interpretation generally considers this limitation as something that
should be reasonable.
In contrast, the test passed by Eugeene had human judges chatting with a chatbot for 5 minutes, after which they had to decide if it was a bot or not.