6
$\begingroup$

Is it true that $\mathsf{P} \neq \mathsf{NP}$ implies $\mathsf{NP} \neq \mathsf{PSPACE}$?

I have here some problem that is in $\mathsf{PSPACE} \setminus \mathsf{NP}$ if $\mathsf{P} \neq \mathsf{NP}$. Since I cannot find a fault in my proof, I wanted to be sure, if the upper implication holds or not.

$\endgroup$
10
$\begingroup$

We know that $\mathrm{L}\subseteq\mathrm{NL}\subseteq\mathrm{P}\subseteq\mathrm{NP}\subseteq\mathrm{PSPACE}$ and at least one of those inclusions is strict, since $\mathrm{L}\subsetneq\mathrm{PSPACE}$ by the space hierarchy theorem. As far as I'm aware, any nonempty subset of the inclusions being strict would be consistent with our current state of knowledge so, in particular, it is not known that $\mathrm{P}\neq\mathrm{NP}$ implies $\mathrm{NP}\neq\mathrm{PSPACE}$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.