Is there an example of a timed automaton that requires infinite clock precision, in order to be controller so as to avoid a deadlock or bad state?

I.e. a transition system that consists of nodes connected by edges, and one or more real-values clocks. Nodes can be attributed with invariant (inequation on clock(s)), and edges (transitions) with guards (idem), labels, and the instruction to reset one or more clocks to 0. The initial state is at one node, with all clocks set to zero. The controller must take transitions along the edges whose guard is valid, such that it is always at a node (location) whose invariant is valid, while the clock values simultaneously increase. I

The system should such that the controller would have to change locations faster and faster, i.e. with the difference in clock values between transitions converging to zero.

  • $\begingroup$ I am not very competent on this, but if it is a single location why have several clocks, and if it is distributed what is simultaneity? $\endgroup$ – babou May 19 '15 at 23:12
  • $\begingroup$ I think multiple clocks would be needed for the automaton to be like this, so that one could be reset to zero while others continue. With simultaneity I just meant the clocks all advance by the same amount, unless one gets reset to zero. $\endgroup$ – tmlen May 20 '15 at 5:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.