3
$\begingroup$

Let's say I have a closed walk $W$ in a directed graph $D$. Represent $W$ as a list of arcs $(a_1, a_2, \dots, a_k)$. Since it's a closed walk, there may be repeated edges, but the source vertex of $a_1$ must equal the target vertex of $a_k$. My claim is that the multiset of arcs $W'=\{a_1, a_2, \dots, a_k\}$ can be partitioned into sets (not multisets) $W'_1, W'_2, \dots, W'_m$ such that the arcs in each $W'_i$ form a simple cycle.

There is a simple algorithm to output these cycles. Travel along $W$ until you visit a vertex $v$ for the second time. Output the arcs between the two occurrences of $v$ (which form a cycle). Repeat this process until the walk is empty.

I'm using this "walk decomposition" lemma in a paper, and it seems like something that should be easy to find in the literature, but I can't find it anywhere. Can anyone point me in the right direction?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ You can state it and include the short proof. That's less trouble than finding some reference. If you want to try and find one, your claim is equivalent to the following: every graph in which all degrees are even has an edge-disjoint cycle cover. $\endgroup$ – Yuval Filmus Feb 22 '16 at 21:47
  • $\begingroup$ Isn't this just what you do for the decomposition of a Euler tour? $\endgroup$ – G. Bach Feb 23 '16 at 9:44
2
$\begingroup$

The problem stated in the question is also presented in the exercise of the book.

If you are writing a research paper, due to the is simplicity of the solution, you may even skip the explanation.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Construct the graph $G = (V,E)$ such that $\forall \ v \in V, \ \exists \ a_i \in W$ such that $a_i$ is incident to $v$ and $E = W$ itself.

This graph $G$ will be connected. Now the multiset $W'$ is an Euler Tour in the graph hence the graph is Eulerian as well. Thus you can use the fact that if we have a cycle $C$ in an Eulerian graph, then the graph remains Eulerian even after removal of $C$.

Reference

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The OP already knows how to prove the claim. They're looking for a reference. $\endgroup$ – Yuval Filmus Feb 23 '16 at 7:09
  • $\begingroup$ @YuvalFilmus The link does kinda provide a reference, albeit not a very citable one $\endgroup$ – David Richerby Feb 23 '16 at 7:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.