I was reading the paper _Efficient Inference in Fully Connected CRFs with Gaussian Edge Potentials (Philipp Krähenbül and Vladen Koltun, in Proceedings of 25th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2011 pdf), and I didn't understand this equation (eq 5) in the paper:

enter image description here

I understand the first equation, but not the second one. If $k(f_i,f_j) = e^{-1*(f_i-f_j)^{2}}$, then $k(f_i,f_j)$ would return a scalar value between 0 and 1 ; 0 if $f_i$ and $f_j$ are far apart in the feature space, 1 otherwise. So, $k(f_i,f_j)Q_j$ adds a fraction of $Q_j$ to $Q_i$ . The first equation is clear. I don't understand how this leads to the 2nd equation. In the 2nd equation, the Gaussian kernel is now over $Q$ instead of being over $f_i,f_j$ and then multiplied by $f_i$. Where is the $f_j$? Can someone explain how the 2nd equation is derived from the first one?

$G \otimes Q$ would again return a value between 0 and 1, which is multiplied by $f_i$ (which is an n-dimensional feature vector). So the result of $(G \otimes Q)(f_i)$ would be an n-dimensional vector, and we subtract $Q_i$ (a scalar) from that. Am I misunderstanding something here?


1 Answer 1


I read the article. The meaning of the equation: $$[G\otimes Q](f_i)$$ stand for $G$ convolution with $Q$ in the feature point $f_i$ and not multiplied by $f_i$.

The $f_j$ is hidden inside the convolution operation.

The actual operation is done using cross bilateral filter. You can see more information on the Project site of the article. You can also find a source code in this site.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.