Came across this question : State whether True or False
A prime attribute can be transitively dependent on a key in 3NF
How could this be true? Because as far as I know, A relation initially in 1NF is said to be in 3NF when partial and transitive dependencies have been eliminated. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Also, would it be correct to say that given a relation which doesn't have any non prime attribute along with no partial dependencies, then the relation is in BCNF ?
(I don't have any knowledge beyond BCNF).