I thought about these languages: $$L_{1} = A_{TM} = \big\{ \langle M, w \rangle \mid M \text{ is TM and }M \text{ accepts } w \big\}$$ $$L_{2} = \overline{HALT_{TM}} = \big\{ \langle M, w \rangle \mid M \text{ is TM and }M \text{ doesn't halt on input } w \big\}$$

Their intersection: $$L_{1}\cap L_{2} = \big\{ \langle M, w \rangle \mid M \text{ is TM and }M \text{ accepts and doesn't halt on input } w \big\}$$

If I assume that the intersection is decidable by TM $T$ so I can use $T$ to decide $A_{TM}$ and that's a contradiction.

Is it true?


Your proof is wrong. Note if $M$ accepts $w$, it must halt on $w$, so $L_1\cap L_2$ is the empty set, which is of course decidable.

To disprove the statement, you can set $L_2$ to be $\Sigma^*$, i.e. the language containing all strings. Since $\emptyset$ is Turing recognizable, $L_2$ is co-Turing recognizable. However, $L_1\cap L_2=L_1$ is undecidable.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Nitpick: we need to explicitly set $L_1$ so to be undecidable but recognizable, e.g. the halting problem. Otherwise, only knowing that $L_1$ is recognizable does not necessarily imply that it is undecidable. $\endgroup$ – chi Jul 27 '18 at 10:12
  • $\begingroup$ @chi, right, I just described the change to the proof in OP. $\endgroup$ – xskxzr Jul 27 '18 at 10:13
  • $\begingroup$ I don't understand your disproving. Did you use these languages: $$E_{TM} = \big\{ \langle M \rangle \mid M \text{ is TM and }L(M)= \emptyset \big\}$$ $$ALL_{TM} = \big\{ \langle M \rangle \mid M \text{ is TM and }L(M)= \Sigma^{*} \big\}$$ What is $L_{1}$ and what is $L_{2}$? $\endgroup$ – Asaf Jul 27 '18 at 12:37
  • $\begingroup$ @Asaf $L_1=A_{TM}$, $L_2=\Sigma^*=\{s\mid s\text{ can be any string }\}$. $\endgroup$ – xskxzr Jul 27 '18 at 12:55
  • $\begingroup$ Why $L_{2}$ is co-Turing recognizable? I can use automata that accepts all strings. $\endgroup$ – Asaf Jul 27 '18 at 13:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.