Questions tagged [hoare-logic]

Questions about Hoare's logical framework for program correctness proofs and variants.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
18
votes
5answers
6k views

Example of an algorithm that lacks a proof of correctness

We have Hoare logic. Why is it still possible that an algorithm is right but there is no proof that it's correct? Suppose the algorithm is expressed in C. Then we can argue step by step that it's ...
18
votes
1answer
2k views

Difference between Dependent type , refinement type and Hoare Logic

I know little dependent type theory. From wikipedia : A dependent type is a type whose definition depends on a value. And from my Type theory course i recall that a dependent type is : Family ...
11
votes
2answers
2k views

How to deal with arrays during Hoare-style correctness proofs

In the discussion around this question, Gilles mentions correctly that any correctness proof of an algorithm that uses arrays has to prove that there are no out-of-bounds array accesses; depending on ...
8
votes
1answer
233 views

What was the major breakthrough between Hoare-Floyd logic and Scott–Strachey semantics?

I'm reading through a commentary on Milner's "The use of machines to assist in rigorous proof" by Mike Gordon. In this paper, he explains how LCF was born from the ideas of denotational semantics by ...
7
votes
1answer
314 views

Hoare logic - total correctness of loops

Consider a while loop of the form : $\texttt{while (C) {S}}$ with $\texttt{C}$ the condition and $\texttt{S}$ the body of the loop. Let $\texttt{I}$ and $\texttt{V}$ respectively be an invariant ...
6
votes
1answer
423 views

Question about the formal proof of the inorder traversing

In Don Knuth's famous series of books, The Art of Computer Programming, section 2.3.1, he describes an algorithm to traverse binary tree in inorder, making use of an auxiliary stack: T1 [Initialize....
5
votes
3answers
998 views

Hoare triple for assignment P{x/E} x:=E {P}

I am trying to understand Hoare logic presented at Wikipedia, Hoare logic at Wikipedia Apparently, if I understand correctly, a Hoare triple $$\{P\}~ C ~\{Q\}$$ means if P just before C, then Q ...
5
votes
3answers
708 views

Intuitive explanation of Hoare assignment axiom

$\small\textit{''The obvious things are the most difficult to understand''}$ May be the question does not make sense, but let me ask it anyway. The Hoare assignment axiom is $$ \dfrac{}{\{Q[v \...
5
votes
1answer
143 views

Relation between Hoare Type Theory and pointers

My understanding is that in Hoare Type Theory every imperative statement has a type of the form {Pre}res:T{Post} where T is the ...
5
votes
1answer
77 views

proving program equivalence

I understand that the general problem of program equivalence is undecidable, but I'm wondering what approaches exist to tackle the problem? I am familiar with Hoare-style verification, but are there ...
4
votes
2answers
2k views

What does it mean to “strengthen the precondition and weaken the postcondition” in Hoare logic?

Having learned a rough summary of Hoare logic (i.e. learning just the basic concept of Hoare triples and a few of the rules) I kept seeing a statement along these lines: The rule of consquence ...
4
votes
2answers
126 views

The difference between a Hoare Triple/Assertion and a Typed Function

I have been trying to wrap my head around applying Hoare Logic and am running into the question of how Hoare triples are any different from (simply) a typed function. That is, say you have a typed ...
4
votes
1answer
95 views

Developing invariants for comparing two strings

The following algorithm is supposed to compare two strings $S_1$ and $S_2$ ("/\" for empty string): ...
4
votes
1answer
142 views

Continuation-passing style: what is meant by “CPS'ing”?

I'm reading Dijkstra Monads for Free for a presentation I'll be doing and it's pretty meaty. One of the things that I keep running into is the term "CPS'ing". I've read a little bit on continuation-...
3
votes
1answer
956 views

What is a predicate transformer?

I'm reading Programming - The derivation of algorithms, and I want to understand the purpose of a predicate transformer. This is the excerpt (p. 14-15): A more precise way in which constructs may ...
3
votes
2answers
264 views

Why is the assignment rule the way it is in Hoare Logic?

Why is the assignment rule the way it is in Hoare Logic/Axiomatic Semantics? I can't wrap my head around why the assignment rule is backwards from what I expected. I understand Hoare logic is use to ...
3
votes
1answer
167 views

The Law of Excluded Miracle in the language of guarded commands

The definition of weakest precondition is familiar (let me use Isabelle's syntax here): definition "wp c Q s ≡ ∃t. (c,s) ⇒ t ∧ Q t" the weakest precondition ...
3
votes
1answer
347 views

Why precondition strengtening is sound in Hoare logic

I have problem with understanding why precondition strengthening is sound rule in Hoare logic. The rule is: $$ {P \implies Q, \{Q\} C \{X\} } \over {\{P\} C \{X\}} $$ I really do not understand why ...
3
votes
1answer
49 views

What's the meaning of the $\top$ symbol in a Hoare triple?

I'm studying program verification and came across the following triple: $$ \{\top\} \;P \; \{y=(x+1)\} $$ What's the meaning of the $\top$ symbol on the precondition? Does it mean $P$ can take any ...
3
votes
1answer
953 views

How to find loop invariant from weakest precondition?

Consider this code: Precondition: Postcondition: rv == i <==> ∃i, 0 ≤ i ≤ a.length-1, a[i] == key ...
3
votes
0answers
372 views

Expression of the weakest precondition of a while loop

I am interested in computing weakest preconditions (WP) of loops. If I refer to Wikipedia "Predicate Transformer semantics", the WP for e.g. total correction of a loop annotated with an invariant I ...
3
votes
0answers
93 views

Spot the formalism (some kind of process logic)

Consider the following specification technique. A specification consists of a finite set of triples $\langle C, A, C' \rangle$, where $A$ is the name of an action and $C, C'$ are conditions, that is, ...
2
votes
1answer
169 views

Find the loop invariant of the given while loop

I don't know how to find a loop invariant. I'm not sure where to start. Can anyone find the loop invariant of the given program and explain your method please. ...
2
votes
1answer
877 views

Proving the loop invariant for a simple program in Hoare logic

I was studying loop invariant and came across Tomas Petricek's example. Here's the equivalent(I believe) program after I revised it a bit for proof in Hoare logic: ...
2
votes
2answers
70 views

How to change the algorithm implication by changing the invariant?

I have this specification in GCL: $[Ctx C: n\geqslant 0\ \wedge\ b:[0..n-1]\ \text{of int}$ $\{Q:\text{True}\}$ $sum,i:=0,0;$ $\{\text{Invariant}\ P: 0\leqslant i \leqslant n\ \wedge sum=\sum_{j=0}...
2
votes
1answer
157 views

Hoare logic, proving conjunction rule from basic rules, possible or not?

(This is HW.) Suppose I have these following proof rules given. I am currently considering if I can prove the conjunction rule (given below) from the above given Hoare logic rules. My answer would ...
2
votes
1answer
190 views

Understanding Hoare Logic Axioms

Given these 5 axioms of Hoare Logic: \begin{array}{cl} \frac{}{\{\phi([x \leftarrow E])\}\ x := E\ \{\phi(x)\}} & \mathtt{Assignment}\\\\ \frac{\{\phi\}\ P_1\ \{\eta\} \quad \{\eta\}\ P_2\ \{\psi\...
2
votes
1answer
190 views

Axiomatic Semantics and Postconditions

I'll preface this by saying that this IS a homework question. However, when asked about how to solve it in class, (I believe) my professor was unable to complete it. The question is: Compute the ...
2
votes
1answer
37 views

Bottleneck in Hoare Logic unable to arrive at my {P} from {Q}

{Q} = {n>0} C1 = i := 1; C2 = c := 1; C3 = p := 0; {P} = {i<=n, p = fib(i-1), c = fib(i)} My lack of understanding towards the rule of consequence in hoare logic is blocking me from find the ...
2
votes
1answer
319 views

Hoare logic - invariant of loop [closed]

I am trying to prove partial corectness of following program: ...
2
votes
0answers
23 views

Formal semantics of a mutable/imperative stack

When introducing formal semantics for data structures, immutable stacks are a nice simple example : $\mathit{is\_empty}(\mathit{create()})=\mathrm{True}$ $\mathit{is\_empty}(\mathit{push}(e, s))=\...
2
votes
0answers
95 views

Hoare triple: Loop invariant and partial correctness

Below there is Hoare triple in which variable $a$ is an array of integers, $len$, $x, i$ are integer-valued variables, and $r$ is a Boolean-valued variable. I have to provide a loop invariant (using ...
2
votes
0answers
170 views

How to show equivalence of the Hoare assignment axiom vs Floyd assignment axiom?

I know from several sources that they are equivalent, but couldn't find a reasonable explanation. My first approach was to show their equivalence by using the logical consequence rule and both axioms, ...
1
vote
2answers
58 views

How to prove a side effect in a function

I asked a question earlier about Saving to the Database, which was very general and about the requirements for a proof when you go through many layers of non-verified systems such as the network and ...
1
vote
1answer
64 views

what is the 'x :=' part mean in a hoare triple?

In Hoare logic, there's a thing called a Hoare triple, e.g.$$ \begin{array}{ccccc} \{x = 2\} & & x := x+1 & & \{x = 3\} \end{array}. $$ What does '$x :=$' mean?
1
vote
1answer
22 views

Hoare-Logic: Requirements for imperfect data types

Theoretically, Hoare-Logic let's one prove the correctness of an algorithm, given pre- and post-condition. However, as far as I've seen it so far, one idealizes his data-types to a mathematical set ...
1
vote
1answer
125 views

How to prove the equivalence between Hoare and Floyd assignment axioms?

How to show that these two axioms are equivalent: 1: $\{G[v/e]\} v:=e \{G\}$ 2: $\{F\} v:=e \{\exists v' (F[v/v'] \land v=e[v/v'])\}$ I've tried with $G = \exists v' (F[v/v'] \land v=e[v/v']) $and ...
1
vote
1answer
969 views

Check whether loop invariants are correct?

I'm trying to prove some code is correct, using Hoare logic. How do I check whether my loop invariants are correct? I'm asked to prove (using Hoare Logic) that the following program is valid: ...
1
vote
2answers
1k views

how to solve Hoare logic problems

I'm having trouble proving Hoare logic questions as I'm not sure of the process that is taken to prove them. I understand that they're rules such as assignment axiom, pre-condition strengthening, post-...
1
vote
1answer
197 views

True Postcondition, with true Precondition

In my exam preparation I stumbled across the follwoing exercise regarding pre and postconditions: As far as I understood the question, we need to express some condition for p, such that if that ...
1
vote
1answer
55 views

How to find the loop invariant in hoare triples

Hey I am new to Hoare triples, and I can't understand on finding the loop invariants in hypothesis. For example this while loop ...
1
vote
1answer
97 views

How to prove $c = a + b$ using Program Verification Techniques

I am trying to prove an elementary thing, but it seems at some point you get down to atoms where you can't prove anything else. This is why I am wondering about proving $c = a + b$, it seems like an ...
1
vote
1answer
194 views

How to use Hoare Logic to Prove this Assertion

Given this assertion in Hoare Logic: \begin{align} &\mathbf{\{p >= 0\}}\\ &s = 0 ; n = 1 ;\\ &\mathtt{while}\ (n <= p)\ \{\\ &\quad s = s + n ;\\ &\quad n = n + 1\\ &\}\\...
1
vote
1answer
123 views

Loop termination - Loop invariant

(x >= 0 && y >= 0) q = 0; r = x; while ( r >=y ) { r = r - y; q = q + 1; } (x = q*y +r) && (r >= 0) && (r < y) For ...
1
vote
1answer
20 views

Hoare Logic for Factorial

I came across this hoare logic for factorials but I don't quite understand it. We multiply F and X but we're not adding up all values of F so how do we get the sum/factorial at the end? Precondition: ...
1
vote
0answers
14 views

Is true * true = true in Separation Logic?

I am trying to show that the following interference is unsound in terms of Separation Logic: $$ (p_0 \implies p_1) \implies ((p_0 * q) \implies (p_1 * q)) $$ I came up with the following values for ...
1
vote
0answers
97 views

How to prove program solves the problem?

I am preparing for the exam on Theory of Programming class. Now I am trying to solve the task from the sample paper: Task description starts here Given the following problem: A problem is given by ...
1
vote
0answers
52 views

Can we ignore the postcondition in the Hoare conditional rule when there is a return statement?

I'm proving the correctness of naive string matching using Hoare logic. I have the following pseudocode: ...
1
vote
0answers
79 views

How to apply Hoare Logic to this function

I would like to apply Hoare Logic to realistic, complex imperative programs that use while loops, if statements, functions, modules, etc. and have side effects (e.g. access the network). In order to ...
1
vote
1answer
548 views

How to get Loop invariants to prove program is correct in Hoare logic

start off stating the definition of a loop invariant. It is a condition that must be true at the start of the loop and must be true after each iteration of the loop. I understand what it is but i have ...