Questions tagged [hoare-logic]

Questions about Hoare's logical framework for program correctness proofs and variants.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
3
votes
1answer
825 views

How to find loop invariant from weakest precondition?

Consider this code: Precondition: Postcondition: rv == i <==> ∃i, 0 ≤ i ≤ a.length-1, a[i] == key ...
1
vote
1answer
867 views

Check whether loop invariants are correct?

I'm trying to prove some code is correct, using Hoare logic. How do I check whether my loop invariants are correct? I'm asked to prove (using Hoare Logic) that the following program is valid: ...
2
votes
1answer
328 views

Why precondition strengtening is sound in Hoare logic

I have problem with understanding why precondition strengthening is sound rule in Hoare logic. The rule is: $$ {P \implies Q, \{Q\} C \{X\} } \over {\{P\} C \{X\}} $$ I really do not understand why ...
2
votes
0answers
163 views

How to show equivalence of the Hoare assignment axiom vs Floyd assignment axiom?

I know from several sources that they are equivalent, but couldn't find a reasonable explanation. My first approach was to show their equivalence by using the logical consequence rule and both axioms, ...
0
votes
1answer
660 views

Finding a Hoare logic correctness proof for a Repeat-Until loop

How can we prove a program in repeat until using Hoare Logic? I've found a rule like this: {P} S {R}, {R ^ ~B -> P}, {R ^ B -> Q} for ...
0
votes
1answer
452 views

Hoare logic - partial/total correctnes and strength invariant

I'm studying Hoare logic and I can't understand the relation between partial and total correctness regarding loop invariant. Suppose for example that I have the following program: ...
0
votes
2answers
362 views

Hoare Calculus Incorrect Assignment Axiom

I'm currently preparing for an exam and recently came across the following exercise and would like to know whether my solution would be correct. Exercise: Prove that the following axiom is not ...
2
votes
1answer
147 views

Axiomatic Semantics and Postconditions

I'll preface this by saying that this IS a homework question. However, when asked about how to solve it in class, (I believe) my professor was unable to complete it. The question is: Compute the ...
5
votes
1answer
374 views

Question about the formal proof of the inorder traversing

In Don Knuth's famous series of books, The Art of Computer Programming, section 2.3.1, he describes an algorithm to traverse binary tree in inorder, making use of an auxiliary stack: T1 [Initialize....
0
votes
1answer
67 views

Does this loop invariant guarantee that the variable never changes?

Suppose you have some loop and and integer k: int k = 5; for (int i = 0 ; i < N; i++) { //(*) //do something } The loop invariant at (*) is: $\{ K=k\}$ ...
3
votes
0answers
93 views

Spot the formalism (some kind of process logic)

Consider the following specification technique. A specification consists of a finite set of triples $\langle C, A, C' \rangle$, where $A$ is the name of an action and $C, C'$ are conditions, that is, ...
4
votes
3answers
903 views

Hoare triple for assignment P{x/E} x:=E {P}

I am trying to understand Hoare logic presented at Wikipedia, Hoare logic at Wikipedia Apparently, if I understand correctly, a Hoare triple $$\{P\}~ C ~\{Q\}$$ means if P just before C, then Q ...
11
votes
2answers
1k views

How to deal with arrays during Hoare-style correctness proofs

In the discussion around this question, Gilles mentions correctly that any correctness proof of an algorithm that uses arrays has to prove that there are no out-of-bounds array accesses; depending on ...